End of the WTA Year: reflections and drug testing
The US Open Women’s Final cast an
uncomfortable shadow across not only the last Grand Slam of the year but also
the rest of the year. It was great that Serena Williams received Comeback
Player of the Year Award which she richly deserved for her incredible rise up
the rankings and on reaching the finals in two Grand Slams back to back. This
still does not compensate for the dreadful treatment she received at the hands
of Ramos who was not the only out of control umpire during the US Open. Umpires
are there to ensure that the match goes smoothly for the players and that all
their needs are met. It’s their responsibility to make sure the players know
what’s going on and what the score is. The spectators also expect to be told
the score and if anything out of the ordinary is happening eg a trainer is
being called on court and for whom. A match is stressful for the players so the
umpire should create a pleasant environment for both players and spectators.
They are not some authoritarian figure who lords over the players as though
they are inferior and need to be kept under control like children. Indeed, the
idea of superior/ inferior is a repugnant notion. Children aren’t inferior to
their teachers, they deserve the same respect as fellow human beings. And part
of being a human being is being able to be empathic and apologise when needed
without fearing a loss of status or control. So I think it was unfortunate that
Ramos didn’t a) apologise to Serena for falsely accusing her of cheating with
her coach, b) take on board what she had said about not using or receiving
coaching and changed it to a soft warning, c) take the time to fully explain
the situation eg why he did it, that her coach had gestured, what she could do
to avoid further warnings/penalties and state explicitly which type of first warning
she had received so she is not confused over how further warnings would proceed
from there. This would have deescalated the dispute immediately and thereby made
a huge difference not only to the match but also post-match, including the undeserved
and disproportionate fines she received, given that male players at the
previous Grand Slam, Wimbledon, received far lower fines for significantly
worse behaviour. The whole episode and debate over the US Open Women’s Final that
followed left a bad taste in the mouth!
Has it been an unpredictable year
in which every Grand Slam saw a different winner? Not really. Surely this was
to be expected. Serena has had to contend with serious additional health issues
as a result of a difficult birth. Kvitova is still coming back from her very
serious injury caused by an attacker in her home. Kuznetsova is finding her way
back from surgery. Sharapova is doing well but also battling her way back after
a drugs ban. Halep has been beset by injuries all year. Dame Wozniacki won the
Australian Open only to be diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis later in the
year, just before the US Open. Radwanska hasn’t played much this season and it’s
unlikely she’ll return next season due to an ongoing foot injury. Safarova
became ill early in the year and has struggled to fully recover. The list goes on.
So it’s no surprise that there are a variety of winners on the tour. Is it a sign
of a changing of the guard? Not necessarily. Pliskova, although injured at the
moment, has added two female coaches to her team. I hope more women tennis
players will do the same. So, it largely depends on the general health of a
player and the extent of their injuries. Hopefully, they will rest up not
overdo practising during their off-season. Rest and sleep can be more important
than spending too much time on court or in the gym.
I am aware that there are people
who were very negative about Sharapova when it was discovered she took a banned
substance, seeing her as a cheat for taking drugs. I personally believed her when
she said she wasn’t aware that the drug she had been taking for many years and which
she needed had suddenly been banned. Indeed, nothing should stop her from
continuing to take it because her doctor claims it is medically necessary, so she
just has to notify the tour. Should she have known? Yes, I suppose one could
argue that she should have checked it herself but Sharapova has someone in her
team who does all that sort of work for her and no surprise. When I started on
the tour I was totally baffled by the sheer complexity of understanding what
you could/could not take. I think the public think it’s a simple list of hard
drugs that enhance your performance – done. No! I couldn’t even take vitamins
because they could contain ingredients which might not appear on the label
and/or might chemically react in an unanticipated way in my body. Caffeine was
another no-no for me (currently, players can eg drink coffee with caffeine in it but caffeine intake in 2018 was nevertheless monitored in-competition and will continue to be so in 2019). The anti-doping list (WADA prohibited list) changes every year and some things that were
banned suddenly aren’t and others that were fine suddenly aren’t fine to take
anymore. It is also hugely complex because the list uses technical names for
chemicals and substances. It took me ages to study it but it needs a pharmacist
to understand it because, frankly, it’s un-understandable by any lay person not
versed in pharmacology and related areas. So before judging an athlete for
taking drugs it’s useful to be aware that it’s easy for them to make a mistake
and take something unknowingly. After reading ITF and WTA articles and
recommendations, I became so uber-careful that I cut out many basic nutritional
food and drink eg fruit juices which had added vitamins, some health and sports
bars and other products freely available in high street health food stores. I didn’t
take vitamin/mineral supplements and didn’t so much as take a disprin. I
discovered you can’t assume a sports bar or drink is fine to consume because it
is advertised as a product approved and used by athletes in other sports eg
footballers because their drugs list can vary from the ITF’s. In fact, I still
stick to this way of life. It became a habit. I’m not sure it was helpful
because I think I lacked energy as a result! Not helpful during matches!
Vitamins are very important for athletes. They can’t absorb enough
vitamins/minerals from their food intake because they are leading a very
physically strenuous life. I think today the tour has approved a certain
product which enables players to take vitamin supplements.
Of course, none of us want
athletes to take drugs and have an unfair advantage over others. I certainly
was and am vehemently opposed to drug taking (both in sports and recreational
use by non-athletes) so drugs testing in sport is important but I also know how
complex the whole issue is and how easily an athlete can get things wrong. Your
mind is on your sport. Understanding difficult technical names for drugs is
very stressful and distracting. You don’t expect simple substances sold in high
streets for everyone to take to be classified as a banned substance, some of
which may have adverse health effects eg heart and brain problems. Surely there
should be a simpler way of making the banned drugs more easily understood! Also,
it would help if players were given courses on reading and understanding the
whole area of drugs and sport and how to ensure they don’t inadvertently ingest
banned substances. As to why some
players are more drugs tested than others baffles me. Why, for instance, is
Serena the most frequently drugs tested USA tennis player by USADA? She has so
many health issues already why cause her more stress. Besides, it would be
feasible that something could chemically react in her body and show up positive
for a banned substance she never took! After all she has to take blood thinning
drugs to control blood clots to which she is prone. Short of being in the
medical profession how can anyone possibly know how their body will react to
certain chemicals in food? There is also the problem of cross-contamination
when conducting a test. A high profile case in the UK discovered that some bus
drivers were testing positive for cocaine despite never having taken it because
they had handled money which had traces of it and they hadn’t washed their
hands before touching the testing kit1.
Wishing all tennis players a
restful, fun off-season. Hope any player with injuries/health problems gets
better. Good luck next year. I’m looking forward to loads of great tennis!
1Moris, S. and agency
19 Mar 2015 ‘Contaminated banknotes caused bus driver to test positive for
cocaine’ available at:
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/mar/19/contaminated-banknotes-caused-bus-driver-test-positive-cocaine
Comments
Post a Comment